![]() |
Roger Bird, 2006 |
Something of a breakthrough this week in the journalism ethics course I’m teaching with Prof. Jean Bosco Rushingabigwi. It’s been our first “group presentations.” Some readers know that in Carleton’s School of Journalism version of the course, students do such presentations in the form of skits, complete with props, costumes, funny hats and sophomoric humour.
Prof. Bosco advised against this approach. We decided instead to hold a panel discussion: students in teams of four confront a previously unseen ethical dilemma, have 20 minutes to discuss it, and then sit down in front of the class in our empty TV studio cavern and provide their take on the dilemme du jour.
Monday was a strain. Students struggled to make clear their intricate, reasoned thoughts on what to do about the charity board that begs a reporter to hush up the news of the alcoholic employee who embezzled millions of Rwandan francs for his private benefit. These students struggled because they were operating in their third language, English. This despite assurances beforehand to our teaching team that the university was indeed trilingual — Kinyarwandan, French and English. No, the university is working towards being trilingual, and these students have the hard task of understanding English-speaking instructors and expressing themselves as well in English. Worse, they didn’t “get” the panel discussion format, an alien import. The panelists were stilted, the students in front of them addressed their questions and comments not to the panel but to the professors, despite our efforts to avoid eye contact, to remain impassive and the like.
But we soldiered on through three cases anyway, with never a doubt about the worthwhileness of the ideas behind the halting words and broken social scene.
Then came Tuesday. Same group. Tougher dilemme du jour: the financial reporter who writes a stock column which makes readers rich while he struggles to make ends meet. His daughter needs expensive dental work. Should he break his paper’s iron rule against him buying or selling stock? Through a deal with a couple of friends? Just this once? Maybe?
We hand out the assignment to all (a few moments later we’ll pick the presenting group). Everyone reading intently. Then someone puts up his hand and asks, more or less, “Could you please give an very simple explanation of what this means?” Bird and Rushingabigwi probe a bit and discover that nobody in the room knows the square root of squat about stock markets, les bourses du monde. Six minutes of explanation by Rushingabigwi in Kinyarwandan. Presenting group steps outside (fresh air!) to consult.
Then their presentation. Animated. Heavy accents. Clear. Good reasoning behind the ethical choices. Then the assembled room. Students leaning forward toward the panel, ignoring the professors (!) hands in the air, pleading to be heard. Raucous but orderly discussion, huge though largely one-sided debate. They would fire that reporter if he even thought about trading stock.
Someone made the point that the underlying lesson about journalism was you’re always learning something new in this trade. These Rwandan students learned several new things over two short days. And they made at least one prof feel less like he was presenting a cardboard replica of a course instead of the real thing.
Tomorrow is Heroes Day in Rwanda, a national holiday to honour all the nation’s heroes. We (the team has been joined by the CBC’s Sylvia Thomson and is minus Allan Thompson off in Nairobi talking to journalists) get a day off and will likely join the crowd tomorrow at the soccer stadium to see what it’s all about.
The Roger and Ann Bird part of the team are still slowly adding birds. On Sunday we met our first bee eaters, the European (in its migratory winter home) and the Cinnamon-chested, with their dazzling arrow-shaped flight configuration, intense turquoise, chestnut, yellow and white paint jobs, and social habits. Today in a walk to the campus there was a felled tree with dark maroon wood at the roadside. It was about half a metre through the middle at ground level. As a confessed tree obsessive, I counted the rings and there were only about 30 of them. In eastern Canada, a hardwood tree that thick would be a 50- to 70-year tree. This one had grown to its thickness since about 1975. That’s what life without winter will do for you.

